SEVERAL PROBLEMS IN FORMAL ASPECTS FOR DISPUTE SETTLEMENT REGARDING CANCELLATION OF ELECTED CANDIDATES OF MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVE AND THE REGENCY/CITY/PROVINCIAL HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVE

Authors

  • Muhammad Adiguna Bimasakti Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Jayapura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.422021.105-122

Keywords:

Dispute, Cancellation of Decision regarding the Elected Candidates, Members of the House of Representative and/or the Regency/City/Provincial House of Representative, General Election Commission, Administrative Court

Abstract

Law No. 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections (General Elections Act) stipulates that the General Election Commission (KPU) has the authority to determine the elected participants in the Election of Candidates of members of the House of Representative and/or the Regency/City/Provincial House of Representative. The General Elections Act also regulates how the process of resolving disputes over the election process and disputes over election results. However, in the event of cancellation or change in the Decision regarding the elected Candidates of members of the House of Representative and/or the Regency/City/Provincial House of Representative by KPU, in the event of a dispute, General Election Act doesn't regulate the dispute resolution process. Thus, this paper tries to explain this problem. The writing method used in this research is a legal-normative approach using statutory approach and conceptual approach. The results of the study indicate that KPU has the authority to resolve disputes over the cancellation or change in the Decision regarding the elected Candidates of members of the House of Representative and/or the Regency/City/Provincial House of Representative according to Law no. 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration, namely through administrative proceedings in the form of administrative objection even though the General Election Act doesn't regulate it, then proceed to an administrative appeal to the KPU's superior. The Administrative Court is also authorized to adjudicate the dispute as an administrative dispute as regulated in the laws and regulations related to the procedural law of the administrative court.

References

Bimasakti, Muhammad Adiguna. “Lawsuit in Administrative Court After Administrative Proceedings Based on Perma No. 6 of 2018.” Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol. 8, No. 3, November 2019.
Fahmi, Khairul, Feri Amsari, dan Busyra Azheri. "Sistem Keadilan Pemilu dalam Penanganan Pelanggaran dan Sengketa Proses Pemilu Serentak 2019 di Sumatera Barat.", Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 17, Nomor 1, Maret 2020.
Harianti, Rahmah, Nursyirwan Effendi, dan Asrinaldi. "Penerapan Prinsip Independensi dan Etika bagi Penyelenggara Pemilu di Aceh pada Penyelenggaraan Pemilu Tahun 2019." Nusantara: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, Vol. 6, No. 2 Tahun 2019.
Jansen, Oswald (ed.). “Comparative Inventory of Silencio Positivo”. Institute of Constitutional and Administrative Law, Utrecht School of Law, September 2008.
Jurdi, Syarifuddin. "Komisi Pemilihan Umum (KPU) dan Penguatan Institusi: Dari Kooptasi Rejim, Kemandirian dan Penguatan Etik Penyelenggara." Call For Paper Evaluasi Pemilu Serentak 2019 Bidang Evaluasi Kelembagaan Pemilu, diakses dari: https://journal.kpu.go.id/index.php/ERE/article/download/166/73/.
Kusuma, Muhammad Noor Halim Perdana dan Muhammad Adiguna Bimasakti. Panduan Beracara Pada Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara dan Peradilan Elektronik (E-Litigasi). Jakarta: Kencana, 2020.
Mubiina, Fathan Ali. "Kedudukan Fraksi di Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia Pasca Reformasi." Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol.17, No. 2, Juni 2020.
Nugroho, Dian Ade dan Retno Mawarini Sukmariningsih. "Peranan Komisi Pemilihan Umum dalam Mewujudkan Pemilu Yang Demokratis." Vol. 1, No. 01, April 2020.
Nuriman, Lazuardi. "Kedaulatan Rakyat dalam Pemilihan Umum Langsung." Buletin Hukum dan Keadilan Adalah, Vol. 1 No. 2e, Tahun 2017.
Patricia, Felicia dan Chindy Yapin. “Penguatan Mekanisme Penyelenggaraan Pemilihan Umum Melalui Rekonstruksi Kesadaran Penyelenggara Pemilihan Umum.” Jurnal Binamulia Hukum, Vol. 8 No. 2, Desember 2019.
Rikardo, Ofis. "Penerapan Kedaulatan Rakyat di dalam Pemilihan Umum di Indonesia berdasarkan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945." Jurnal Hukum Sasana, Vol. 6 No. 1, Juni 2020.
Ronsumbre, Nelwan dan Mohammad Benny. "Keberadaan Perwakilan Wilayah Adat di Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Papua (DPRP) dalam Perspektif Kontrak Sosial dan dalam Perspektif Representasi di Provinsi Papua.", Jurnal Responsive, Vol. 1 No. 2 Desember 2018.
Simanjuntak, Enrico. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara: Transformasi dan Refleksi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2018.
Sukadi, Imam ."Asas Contrarius Actus sebagai Kontrol Pemerintah Terhadap Kebebasan Berserikat dan Berkumpul di Indonesia." Jurnal Mimbar Keadilan, Vol. 12, No. 2, Agustus 2019.
Susanto, Sri Nur Hari. "Metode Perolehan dan Batas-Batas Wewenang Pemerintahan." Administrative Law & Governance Journal. Vol. 3 Issue 3, September 2020.
Tauda, Gunawan A. dan Oce Madril. "Reformulasi Pengisian Jabatan Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah Melalui Pemilihan Serentak Lokal." Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, Vol. 18, No. 1, Maret 2021.
Tuloli, Syafrul Achmad Ramadhan. "Tinjauan Yuridis Mekanisme Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hasil Pemilu oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi." Jurnal Lex Administratum, Vol. 7, No 3 Tahun 2019.
Utrecht, E. Pengantar dalam Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: N.V. Penerbitan dan Balai Buku Indonesia, 1953.
Wahyunadi, Yodi Martono. Kompetensi Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia. Diakses dari: https://ptun-jakarta.go.id/wp-content/uploads/file/berita/daftar_artikel/Kompetensi%20Pengadilan%20Tata%20Usaha%20Negara%20Dalam%20Sistem%20Peradilan%20Di%20Indonesia.pdf .

B. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan dan Putusan Pengadilan
Indonesia. Undang Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. UUD NRI Tahun 1945.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. UU No. 5 Tahun 1986. LN No. 77 Tahun 1986. TLN No. 3344.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1986 Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. UU No. 9 Tahun 2004. LN No. 35 Tahun 2004. TLN No. 4380.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1986 Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. UU No. 51 Tahun 2009. LN No. 160 Tahun 2009. TLN No. 5079.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan. UU No. 30 Tahun 2014. LN No. 292 Tahun 2014. TLN No. 5601.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Tentang Pemilihan Umum. UU No. 7 Tahun 2017. LN No. 182 Tahun 2017. TLN No. 6109.
Mahkamah Agung, Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Tentang Pedoman Penyelesaian Sengketa Administrasi Pemerintahan Setelah Menempuh Upaya Administratif. PERMA No. 6 Tahun 2018.
Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Makassar. Putusan No. 137/G/2019/PTUN.MKS.

Downloads

Published

2021-08-31

How to Cite

Bimasakti, Muhammad Adiguna. “SEVERAL PROBLEMS IN FORMAL ASPECTS FOR DISPUTE SETTLEMENT REGARDING CANCELLATION OF ELECTED CANDIDATES OF MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVE AND THE REGENCY CITY PROVINCIAL HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVE”. Jurnal Hukum Peratun 4, no. 2 (August 31, 2021): 105–122. Accessed January 31, 2025. http://jurnalhukumperatun.mahkamahagung.go.id/index.php/peratun/article/view/183.

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021)

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)