SHORSING OF STATE ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION ON DECISION NUMBER 74/G/2014/PTUN-BDG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.522022.137-158Keywords:
Delays Implementation, Administrative Decision, Administrative JusticeAbstract
The Procedural Law of the State Administrative Court is a pure law which means that there is no obstacle in implementing the State Administrative Decision (KTUN) if the KTUN is sued. However, the Plaintiff can apply to postpone the disputed KTUN as compensation during the examination. The research method of this journal is normative juridical and qualitative descriptive with analytical theory. Since the issuance of the Judicial Administration Law, there have been several developments in delaying the implementation of a decision, especially in its mechanism. There are several factors that become the basis for the judge's consideration in granting a request for a postponement of the implementation of a decision, this is regulated in Article 67 of Law Number 5 of 1986, one of which is the very urgent interest of the Plaintiff. This is because the Plaintiff will suffer huge losses if the decision being sued is issued.
References
Sumber Buku
Abdullah, Rozali. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 1991.
Basah, Sjachran. Eksistensi dan Tolok Ukur Badan Peradilan Peradilan Administrasi Negara Republik Indonesia. Bandung: Alumni Bandung, 2010.
Fachruddin, Irfan. Pengawasan Peradilan Administrasi terhadap Tindakan Pemerintah. Bandung: Alumni Bandung, 2004.
Hadjon, Philipus M. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat di Indonesia. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu, 1987.
Ibrahim, Johnny. Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Surabaya: Bayi Media Publishing, 2005.
Marbun, SF. Peradilan Administrasi Negara dan Upaya Administrasi di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1997.
Siahaan, Lintong O. Wewenang PTUN Menunda Berlakunya Keputusan Pemerintah. Jakarta: Perum Percetakan Negara RI, 2006.
Supandi. Hukum Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Kepatuhan Hukum Pejabat dalam Menaati Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Medan: Pustaka Bangsa Press, 2011.
Tjandra, Riawan. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (Edisi Revisi). Yogyakarta: Universitas Atma Jaya, 2005.
Wiyono. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jakarta, Sinar Grafika: 2005.
Sumber Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.
Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan.
Sumber Jurnal/Artikel
Caniago Sa’ad, Miftah. “Penundaan Pelaksanaan Keputusan Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara (Schorsing) yang Berpotensi Merusak Lingkungan.†Media Syari’ah 21, no. 2 (2019): 172.
Sudarsono, “Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara Pasca Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014â€, Tanjungpura Law Journal 1, Issue 2 (2017): 157-158.
Suriadinata, Vincent. “Asas Presumptio Iustae Causa dalam KTUN: Penundaan Pelaksanaan KTUN Oleh Hakim Peradilan Umumâ€. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 2 (2018): 140.
Website
Sitorus, Arthun Daniel P. “Mengenal Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara,†https://indonesiare.co.id/id/article/mengenal-sengketa-tata-usaha-negara-3#:~:text=%E2%80%9CSengketa%20Tata%20Usaha%20Negara%20adalah,termasuk%20sengketa%20kepegawaian%20berdasarkan%20peraturan (diakses 18 Juni 2022)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Santi Hapsari Dewi Adikancana, Ladyva Rizqina Dinissa, Amanda Khoirunnisa S, Fauziyah Rahmah Izzati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
