ELECTRONIC LITIGATION AS A MEAN OF EFFORT TO MODERNIZED LITIGATION IN THE NEW NORMAL ERA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.412021.31-44Keywords:
Electronic Litigation, E-Court, Covid-19 PandemicAbstract
Electronic Court (E-court) was arranged by the Supreme Court prior to the Covid-19 pandemic with the issuance of Supreme Court Regulation (hereby refered as “Permaâ€) No. 3 of 2018 and restrictions with Perma No. 1 of 2019. The application of Electronic Court (E-court) greatly helps the realization of the Vision of the Supreme Court to become a Supreme Indonesian Judiciary Body, which in point 10 is the realization of the Vision of the Supreme Court in the Blueprint is to create a Modern Judiciary Body based on integrated information technology. In the New Normal Era, conventional trials must switch to online trials to prevent Covid-19 based on SEMA No. 1 of 2020. In addition to the many benefits obtained from the implementation of electronic court (e-court), especially during The New Normal Era, there are several obstacle of conducting electronic hearings, such as Electronic proceedings have not yet been regulated in the procedural law because they have only been regulated in a Supreme Court Regulation. Limited facilities and infrastructure, lack of human resources and the trial that was felt to be closed because it was only attended by online parties were also obstacles in electronic litigation.
References
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, Keberlanjutan Modernisasi Peradilan-E- Court-Laporan Tahunan 2019, Jakarta, Mahkamah Agung RI.
_______. Dasar-dasar Pemikiran Peratun Menuju Peradilan Modern Berbasis Elektronik (E-Court), Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Militer dan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, 2019.
_______. Cetak Biru Pembaruan Peradilan 2010-2035, Jakarta, Mahkamah Agung RI, 2010.
Soekanto, Soerjono dan Purnadi Purbacaraka. Aneka Cara Pembedaan Hukum, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 1989.
Sudarsono. Legal Issues Pada Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Pasca Reformasi, Jakarta, Kencana, 2019.
_______ dan Rabbenstain Izroiel. Petunjuk Praktis Beracara di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara-Konvensional dan Elektronik, Prenadamedia Group, Cetakan Pertama, Jakarta, 2019.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta, Liberty, 2006.
Supandi. Modernisasi Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 untuk mendorong Kemajuan Peradaban Hukum Indonesia, Undip Press, Semarang, 2019.
Reiling, D. Teknologi Untuk Keadilan: Bagaimana Teknologi Informasi Dapat Mendukung Reformasi Pengadilan, PT Alumni, Bandung, 2018.
Lotulung, P.E, Lintasan Sejarah dan Gerak Dinamika Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara,
Penerbit Salemba Humanika, Jakarta, 2013.
B. Jurnal
Anggraeni, RR Dewi. “Wabah Pandemi Covid-19, Urgensi Pelaksanaan Sidang Secara elektronikâ€. ADALAH: Buletin Hukum dan Keadilan, Vol 4, No. 1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.15408/adalah .v4i1.15264, diakses tanggal 3 Maret 2021.
Doramia, Lumbanraja Anggita. “Perkembangan Regulasi dan Pelaksanaan Persidangan Online Di Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat Selama Pandemi Covid-19â€. CREPIDO: Jurnal, Volume 02, Nomor 01, Juli 2020, https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/crepido, diakses tanggal 3 Maret 2021.
Cahyaningrum, Dian. “Persidangan Secara Elektronik Pada Masa Pandemi Covid- 19â€, Info Singkat, Volume XII, No. 14/II/Puslit/Juli/2020.
https://berkas.dpr.go.id/puslit/files/info_singkat/info%20singkat-XII-14-II-P3DI-Juli-2020-191 diakses tanggal 3 Maret 2021.
C. Peraturan Perundang-undangan
Indonesia. Undang-undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.
Mahkamah Agung. Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 tentang Administrasi Perkara Pengadilan Secara Elektronik.
