TO OVERCOME THE CONSTRAINTS OF PROOF IN THE APPLICATION OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.322020.97-110Keywords:
Electronic proof, ProofAbstract
The existence of electronic information and / or electronic documents has been recognized as valid evidence which is an extension of the evidence in the Procedure Law that applies in Indonesia provided that the electronic information and / or electronic documents use electronic systems in accordance with the provisions stipulated in Law No. 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions. However, despite the ITE Law as well as several other regulations, it cannot be said that the Indonesian Procedural Law has stipulated electronic evidence in evidence, because the regulation of electronic evidence is in the realm of material law. Proof using electronic evidence at the trial has debates such as the examination of witnesses using the teleconference in the case of BULOG and marriage /consent qobul conducted different countries. Besides there are several other obstacles such as 1. Authentication of electronic evidence 2. Procedures for showing the instrument electronic evidence and 3. Electronic signatures. Responding to these constraints, the renewal of the procedural law must be carried out immediately by including the electronic evidence and changing the evidence system from a closed proof system to an open proof system, in order to accommodate the development of evidence, especially electronic evidence.
References
Agung, Mahkamah. Cetak Biru Pembaruan Peradilan 2010-2035. Jakarta, 2010.
Fakhriah, Efa Laela. Bukti Elektronik Dalam Sistem Pembuktian Perdata. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2017.
Fuadi, Munir. Teori Hukum Pembuktian (Pidana Dan Perdata). Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2006.
Hilman, Muhammad Neil el. Pemeriksaan Alat Bukti Digital Dalam Proses Pembuktian. Seminar tentang Digital Forensik. Semarang, 2012.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarata: Liberty, 2006.
P, Santhos Wachjoe. “Penggunaan Informasi Elektronik Dan Dokumen Elektronik Sebagai Alat Bukti Persidangan.†Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan (2016).
Rachman, Minanoer. Penggunaan Informasi Atau Dokumen Elektronik Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Proses Litigasi. Surabaya, 2012.
Sasangka, Hari, and Lly Rosita. Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Perkara Pidana. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2003.
Soekanto, Soerjono, and Purnadi Purbacaraka. Aneka Cara Pembedaan Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1989.
Soeprapto, Maria Farida Indrati. Ilmu Perundang-Undangan: Jenis, Fungsi Dan Materi Muatan. Yogyakarata: Kanisius, 2007.
Subekti. Hukum Pembuktian. 11th ed. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 1995.
Sudarsono. Legal Issues Pada Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Pasca Reformasi. Jakarta: Prenada Kencana, 2019.
Supandi. Modernisasi Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 Untuk Mendorong Kemajuan Peradaban Hukum Indonesia. Semarang: Undip Press, 2019.
Peraturan perundang-undangan
Undang-undang No. 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.
Undang-undang No. 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-undang No. 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.
Undang-undang No. 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan.
Internet
Hukum online http://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/syarat-dan -kekuatan-hukum-alat-bukti-elektronik, diakses tanggal 8 Okotober 2020.
Blog. http://arijuliano, blogspot.com/2008/04/apakah-dokumen elektronik-dapat-menjadi-alat-bukti-yang-sah, diakses tanggal 8 Oktober 2020.