CHALLENGES IN THE EXAMINATION OF GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION CASES IN ADMINISTRATIVE COURT

Authors

  • Hidayat Pratama Putra Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Jayapura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.512022.75-94

Keywords:

Government administration action, Expansion of administrative court authority, Governmental Real Acts

Abstract

After the enactment of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning government administration, there are basic things that have impacts on the authority of the administrative court, one of which is governmental real acts. This paper tries to analyze the potential problems that become challenges at the level of implementation of the settlement of cases of “government administrative actions†in the Administrative Court including misunderstanding of the concept of government administrative actions, the accountability regarding administrative tort due to government administrative actions, as well as compensation mechanisms for losses caused by it. Problems were analyzed based on normative legal research methods which were analyzed descriptively. The main challenge in the examination of government administrative actions is that there are many misperceptions about the concept of government administrative actions. Government administration actions are basically real act (Feitelijke handeling) and cannot be interpreted as government actions in a broad sense or known as bestuurshandelingen. Then the concept of accountability for administrative tort in the form of government administrative actions and compensation mechanisms for losses needs to be clarified through laws and regulations because currently there is no standard benchmark regarding the concept of accountability for an administrative tort in the form of government administrative actions, and its compensation mechanisms adequate to the damages for the losses.

References

Jurnal
Sidabutar, Reydonaldo Thomas dan Anna Erliyana. “Rekonstruksi Hukum terhadap Ganti Kerugian dan Penundaan Pelaksanaan Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara yang berdasarkan nilai keadilan”. Jurnal Pakuan Law Review Vol. 6, No. 1 (2020): 204, https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v6i1.2133.
Simanjuntak, Enrico.“Tantangan dan Peluang Kompensasi Ganti Rugi di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara”.Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol. 2, No. 1 (2019): 16-17, https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.212019.33-54.
Buku
Bimasakti, Muhammad Adiguna. Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (PMH) Oleh Pemerintah / Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad (OOD) Dari Sudut Pandang Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2018.
Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Militer dan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Dasar Dasar Pemikiran Peratun Menuju Peradilan Modern Berbasis Elektronik (e-court) (Kumpulan Makalah Indroharto, S.H. dan lampiran Perma No. 1 Tahun 2019, Perma No. 2 Tahun 2019, serta SK. KMA No. 129/KMA/SK/VIII/2019). Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Militer dan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, 2019.
Effendi, Aan dan Freddy Poerrnomo. Hukum Administrasi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2017.
HR., Ridwan. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2013.
Ilmar, Aminuddin. Hukum Tata Pemerintahan. Jakarta: Kencana, 2014.
Indroharto. Usaha Memahami Undang-Undang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Buku I Beberapa Pengertian Dasar Hukum Tata Usaha Negara. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan, 1994.
Marbun, SF. Peradilan Administrasi Negara dan Upaya Administratif di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2010.
Sadjijono. Memahami Beberapa Bab Pokok Hukum Administrasi. Yogyakarta, Laksbang Pressindo, 2008.
Simanjuntak, Enrico. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Transformasi dan Refleksi. Jakarta; Sinar Grafika, 2018.
Subur dkk. Bunga Rampai Peradilan Administrasi Kontemporer. Yogyakarta: Genta Press, 2014.
Sudarsono. Legal Issues pada Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Pasca-Reformasi, Hukum Acara dan Peradilan Elektronik. Jakarta: Kencana, 2018.
Wahyunadi, Yodi Martono. Kompetensi Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Setelah Pemberlakuan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Bandar Lampung, Aura Publishing, 2018.
Wiyono, R. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2005.

Prosiding
Hadjon, Philipus M.. “Kompetensi Absolut Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara”. Makalah Narasumber HUT Peratun 2017. PTUN Jakarta, 2017, http://ptun-jakarta.go.id/wp-content/uploads/file/makalah_narasumber_hut_peratun_2017/prof_dr_philipus_m_hadjon_sh/Kompetensi%20Absolut%20Peradilan%20Tata%20Usaha%20Negara.pdf.

Downloads

Published

2022-02-28

How to Cite

Putra, Hidayat Pratama. “CHALLENGES IN THE EXAMINATION OF GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION CASES IN ADMINISTRATIVE COURT”. Jurnal Hukum Peratun 5, no. 1 (February 28, 2022): 75–94. Accessed May 17, 2025. http://jurnalhukumperatun.mahkamahagung.go.id/index.php/peratun/article/view/205.

Issue

Section

Articles