LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE DECISION OF THE STATE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN TERMS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF REGIONAL AUTONOMY AND THE UNITARY STATE

Authors

  • Ari Wirya Dinata Universitas Bengkulu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.412021.1-30

Keywords:

Verdict, Administrative Court, Non-Compliance, Regional Autonomy, Unitary State

Abstract

Implementation of rule of law in Indonesia takes the consequences to establishing the state administrative court. The state administrative court as a legal institution is a manifestation check and balance principle. So that the government does not commit arbitrary action or does not abuse of their power. Administrative court is a place to assess if there are acts of state administrative bodies / officers are not based on the laws and regulations of general principles of good governance or even harm the community. As a respected judicial institution (state administrative court), the decision of the state administrative court must be respected and implemented by each party. In practice, however, there are a number of non-compliance committed by state administrative bodies / officials. They are opposed to carrying out the decision of the state administrative court despite having a legally binding verdict. Therefore, this writing tries to comprehensively discuss the causes of non-compliance by state agencies or administrators. Furthermore, this study also discusses the legal implications that occur if the state administrative agency / official still ignores the court's decision according to the prevailing laws and regulations. The next study discusses the relationship between central government and local government in the framework of regional autonomy is associated with non-compliance that occurred. For as it is known that the President as head of government holds full power to run the government and ensure all policies implemented by the local government even more so in the concept of a unitary state.

References

A. Buku dan Jurnal
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Konstitusi & Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta KonPress, 2008
_______. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara, Jakarta: KonPres, 2011.
_______. Komentar Atas Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: KonPress, 2008.
Atmosudirjo, Prajudi. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: Balai Aksara, 1921.
Basah, Sjarchran. Eksistensi dan Tolok Ukur Badan Peradilan Administrasi di Indonesia. Bandung: Alumni, 1997.
Djunaedi, Eddy, Edi Rohaedi, dan Kadar Slamet. Mengkaji Kembali Pokok-Pokok Pembentukan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara di Indonesia, Jakarta:LPP-HAN, 2003.
Farida, Maria. Ilmu Perundang-Undangan, Jenis, Fungsi dan Materi Muatan. Jakarta: Kanisius, 2007.
Hadjon, Philipus M. Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2009.
Harahap, Zairin. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2002.
Huda, Ni’matul. Desentralisasi Asimetri Dalam NKRI. Bandung: NusaMedia, 2014.
Indroharto. Usaha Memahami Undang-Undang tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Buku II Beracara di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan, 2003.
Kansil, CST. Modul Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta Pradya Paramita, 1996.
Mahfud. Perdebatan Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar dan Perubahannya. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2011.
Mangkoedilaga, Benjamin. Lembaga Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Suatu Prospek di Masa Datang. Bandung: Angkasa, 1988.
_______. Lembaga Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Suatu Orientasi Pengenalan. Bandung: Ghalia Indonesia, 1983.
Mansoer. Pembahasan Beberapa Aspek tentang Kekuasaan-Kekuasaan Eksekutif dan Legislatif Negaa Indonesia. 1983, Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.
Martiman. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Bandung: Ghalia Indonesia, 1996.
Ramses, Andy dan La Bakry. Politik & Pemerintahan Indonesia. Jakarta: MIPI, 2011.
Rozali, Abdullah. Hukum Kepegawaian. Jakarta : Penerbit CV Rajawali, 1986.
Soemito, Rochmat. Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jakarta: Erissco, 1993.
_______. Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 1998.
Tjakranegara, Soegijatno. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010.
Wiyono. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2007.
Yuliandri. Asas-Asas Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan yang Baik. Jakarta: Rajawali Press. 2005.

B. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Dasar NRI 1945.
_______. Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah.
_______. Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.
_______. Undang-undang Nomor 9 Tahun 2004 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.
_______. Undang-Undang Nomor 51 Tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.
_______. Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Administrasi Negara.
_______.Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara.

Downloads

Published

2021-02-28

How to Cite

Dinata, Ari Wirya. “LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE DECISION OF THE STATE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN TERMS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF REGIONAL AUTONOMY AND THE UNITARY STATE”. Jurnal Hukum Peratun 4, no. 1 (February 28, 2021): 1–30. Accessed January 31, 2025. http://jurnalhukumperatun.mahkamahagung.go.id/index.php/peratun/article/view/175.

Issue

Section

Articles