INDONESIAN LEGAL PLURALISM FOR STATE ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGES: BETWEEN CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.312020.19-34Keywords:
Legal Pluralism, Judge, Administrative CourtAbstract
This research is explaining the challenges and opportunities for the resolution of administrative disputes by administration judges as executors of the judicial authority to examine, decide and resolve disputes in the reality of legal pluralism in Indonesia. To analyze the legal issues, this research presents the concepts of legal pluralism and then sees how the implications for the implementation of the authority of administration judges in the process of dispute resolution. This study is important because law enforcement and justice by the judiciary in the midst of legal pluralism have provided challenges and opportunities for judges in order to ensure court decisions are able to answer legal needs and provide substantive justice for justice seekers.
References
Imamulhadi. “Perkembangan Prinsip Strict Liability Dan Precautionary.†Jurnal Mimbar Hukum 25, no. 3 (2013): 417–432.
Irianto, Sulistyowati. “Sejarah Dan Perkembangan Pemikiran Pluralisme Hukum Dan Konsekuensi Metodologisnya.†Jurnal. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan 33, no. 4 (2003): 490–491.
Kusdarini, Eny, Sunarso, and Setiati Widihastuti. “Pengembangan Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik Melalui Local Wisdom Keraton Yogyakarta.†Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora 21, no. 1 (2016): 22–32.
Sunaryo. “Globalisasi Dan Pluralisme Hukum Dalam Pembangunan Sistem Hukum Pancasila.†Masalah-Masalah Hukum 42, no. 4 (2013): 535–541.
Wahyunadi, Yodi Martono. Kompetensi Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Setelah Pemberlakuan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Bandar Lampung: AURA Publishing, 2018.
Peraturan perundang-undangan dan putusan pengadilan
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman (Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 2009 Nomor 157, Tambahan Lembaran Negara RI Nomor 5076).
Mahkamah Agung RI. Putusan Nomor: 217/G/2014/PTUN.JKT tertanggal 25 Februari 2015.
Lain-lain
Hukumonline.com. “Pluralisme Hukum Harus Diakuiâ€, https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/ baca/hol15089/pluralisme-hukum-harus-diakui/, diakses 7 November 2019.
Rinaldi, Yanis. “Perspektif Pluralisme Hukumâ€, https://aceh.tribunnews.com/2012/12/17/ perspektif-pluralisme-hukum, diakses 7 November 2019.
