ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF MAIN DUTIES AND JUDICIAL INSTITUTION FUNCTIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.222019.149-164Keywords:
Electronic signature, Duties of the Judiciary, Electronic CourtAbstract
One of the important elements in the Electronic Court System (e-Court) is the electronic signature as regulated in article 26 of the Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2019. In addition to the electronic litigation system, electronic signatures will also be very useful in the implementation of basic tasks of the judiciary, both in trial administration and general administration of the court. This research will discuss electronic signature in court administration as the main topic and will be elaborated with several related topics which include the task of the judicial institution, the electronic signature in the judicial system, person in charge of electronic signature in court administration, and the validity of documents with an electronic signature. The result of the research shows that electronic signature is crucial on implementation of court functions which are judicial function, regulatory function, and executive function performed by the court. Electronic signature creates the process of the case, trial, and general administration in court become more effective, efficient, and eco-friendly, and it also will increase public trust and security of the electronic transaction. Judicial documents that are electronically signed by authorized officials have legal force and legal consequences that can be used for legal remedies, evidence, and so on. For these reasons, it is necessary for the Supreme Court issuing the regulation on the implementation of electronic signatures in judicial institutions in performing their main tasks and functions.
References
Buku dan Jurnal
Budiardjo, Miriam. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2008.
HR, Ridwan. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2013.
Setiyawan, Anton. Pemanfaatan Sertifikat Elektronik Dan Kesadaran Keamanan Guna Mendukung Digitalisasi Sistem Peradilan Yang Terpercaya. Bimbingan Teknis. Denpasar, 2019.
Sudarsono. Legal Issues Pada Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Pasca Reformasi: Hukum Acara Dan Peradilan Elektronik. Jakarta: Prenada Kencana, 2019.
Syam, Nina Winangsih. Komunikasi Peradaban. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2014.
Utrecht, E. Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia. Surabaya: Pustaka Tinta Mas, 1986.
Peraturan perundang-undangan
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. UU No. 5 Tahun 1986. LN No. 77 Tahun 1986. TLN No. 3344.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1986 Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. UU No. 9 Tahun 2004. LN No. 35 Tahun 2004. TLN No. 4380.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1986 Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. UU No. 51 Tahun 2009. LN No. 160 Tahun 2009. TLN No. 5079.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan. UU No. 30 Tahun 2014. LN No. 292 Tahun 2014. TLN No. 5601.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 71 Tahun 2019 tentang Penyelenggaraan Sistem dan Transaksi Elektronik. LN.2019/NO.185, TLN NO.6400, JDIH.SETNEG.GO.ID : 57 HLM.
PERMA Nomor 3 Tahun 2018 tentang Administrasi Perkara di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik
PERMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 tentang Administrasi Perkara dan Persidangan di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik
Keputusan Ketua Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 57/KMA/SK/IV/2016 tentang Perubahan Atas Keputusan Ketua Mahkamah Agung. Republik Indonesia Nomor 271/KMA/SK/X/2013 tentang Pedoman Penyusunan Kebijakan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia
Sumber Internet
Ilman Hadi, dalam https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/ulasan/lt50849c2f 208c2/perbedaan-antara-petikan-dengan-salinan/
