MODERNIZATION OF THE STATE ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION IN THE ERA OF THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION 4.0 TO ENHANCE THE PROGRESS OF INDONESIAN LEGAL CIVILIZATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.222019.124-148Keywords:
Information Technology, Electronic Court, Electronic Evidence, Administrative CourtAbstract
Information technology has changed all aspects of human life, including law and government. The transformation of conventional government into electronic government (e-government) is one of the public policy issues that dovelop continuosly in various countries all over the world. In exercising judicial power in Indonesia, Supreme Court has taken an initiative to develop public services through information technology networks by implementation of electronic court system. As one of the judicial institutions under the Supreme Court, the Administrative Court has also modernized the implementation of its duties to enforce law and justice. The modernizations in the Administrative Court include five issues that will be mainly discussed in this research, namely: (1) the development of the authority of the Administrative Court; (2) Progressive decisions in the Administrative Court; (3) Evolution of thought and work culture in the Administrative Court; (4) e-court, paperless and green courts; and (5) Electronic decision and electronic evidence in the Administrative Court.
References
Buku dan Jurnal
Briant D. Loader. “The Virtual State.†In The Governance of Cyberspace. London: Routledge, 1997.
Makarim, Edmon. “Keautentikan Dokumen Publik Elektronik Dalam Administrasi Pemerintahan Dan Pelayanan Publik.†Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan 45, no. 4 (2015): 508–570. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol45.no4.60
Nathaniel Branden. “Self-Esteem in the Information Age.†In The Organization of the Future, edited by Frances Hesselbein, Marshall Goldsmith, and Richard Beckhard. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1997.
Osborne, David, and Peter Plastrik. Banishing Bureaucracy. Massachusetts: Addison Wesley Publishing, 1997.
Prins, J., J.E.J. Prins, M. Eifert, Clarisse Girot, M. Groothuis, and W. Voermans. E-Government and Its Implications for Administrative Law:Regulatory Initiatives in France, Germany, Norway and the United States. Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2002.
Reiling, Dory. Teknologi Untuk Keadilan: Bagaimana Teknologi Informasi Dapat Mendukung Reformasi Pengadilan. Edited by Eddy Damian, Supandi, and Imam Mulyana. Bandung: Alumni, 2018.
Richard Susskind. Tomorrow’s Lawyers, an Introduction to Your Future. Second. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
Supandi. Hukum Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Bandung: Alumni, 2016.
———. Kapita Selekta Hukum Tata Usaha Negara. Bandung: Alumni, 2016.
Peraturan perundang-undangan
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. UU No. 5 Tahun 1986. LN No. 77 Tahun 1986. TLN No. 3344.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1986 Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. UU No. 9 Tahun 2004. LN No. 35 Tahun 2004. TLN No. 4380.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1986 Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. UU No. 51 Tahun 2009. LN No. 160 Tahun 2009. TLN No. 5079.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan. UU No. 30 Tahun 2014. LN No. 292 Tahun 2014. TLN No. 5601.
Sumber Internet
Muhammad Iqbal Suma, “Paperless Culture,†Geotimes, 7 Februari 2019, https://geotimes.co.id/opini/paperless-culture/
