About the Journal

Aims and Scope

Jurnal Hukum Peratun aims to provide a venue for academicians, researchers, and practitioners to publish original research articles or review articles. The scope of articles published in this journal discusses various topics in the field of Administrative Law and other sections related to contemporary problems in administrative law such as:
- Tax Law
- Land Law
- Environmental Law
- Labor Law
- Government Law
- Regional Government Law
- Health Law
- Agrarian Law
- Public Policy Law
- Natural Resources Law

Section Policies

Articles

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer-Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Jurnal Hukum Peratun uses the Open Journal System for managing and publishing scholarly journals. The submission and peer review of every article must be managed using this system and based on the following Peer Review Policy.

1. The Editorial Board first reviews the submitted manuscript called the initial review by the editors. It will be desk evaluated whether the submitted manuscript is suitable for the Jurnal Hukum Peratun based on aims and scope, similarity score by using Turnitin, methodological flaw, readability of the articles, and adherence to the submitted paper template
2. The Editorial Board is responsible for the selection of papers and the selection of reviewers.
3. Articles must typically be reviewed by at least one independent reviewer.
4. Reviewers are unaware of the identity of the authors, and authors are also unaware of the identity of reviewers (double-blind review)
5. The reviewing process will consider novelty, objectivity, method, scientific impact, conclusion, and references
6. The anonymous reviewers' comments are then sent to the corresponding author for necessary actions and responses. Afterward, the editorial board suggested the final decision for the revised manuscript by the authors.
7. The accepted manuscript then continued to the copyediting and layout editing process to prepare the camera-ready paper.
8. The Editorial Board shall protect the confidentiality of all material submitted to the journal and all communications with reviewers.

The decisions of the editorial board of Jurnal Hukum Peratun at the initial review are:

• Continuing to review by the reviewer
• Rejected and can submit again
• Rejected

The decision of the editorial board of Jurnal Hukum Peratun in the reviewing process:

• Accepted
• Minor Revision
• Mayor Revision
• Rejected

Copyright Notice

License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

1. They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
2. The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read our Posting Your Article Policy here.
3. The work is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
4. The work has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
5. They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
6. They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

Copyright
Authors who publish with Jurnal Hukum Peratun agree to the following terms:

1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Open Access Policy

Jurnal Hukum Peratun is an open-access journal that provides immediate, worldwide, barrier-free access to the full text of all published articles without charging readers or their institutions for access. Readers have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of all articles in the Jurnal Hukum Peratun. This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Publication Frequency

Jurnal Hukum Peratun is published two times a year in February and August.

Article Processing Charges

This journal charges the following author fees.
Article Submission Charges: 0.00 (IDR)
Article Processing Charges: 0.00 (IDR)
Article Publication Charges: 0.00 (IDR)

Every article submitted to Jurnal Hukum Peratun will not have any 'Article Processing Charges'. This includes submitting, peer-reviewing, editing, publishing, maintaining, and archiving and allows immediate access to the full-text versions of the articles. Jurnal Hukum Peratun has no Waiver Policy. Aside from the free electronic version, Jurnal Hukum Peratun is also available in printed versions at certain amounts of charge. Each published issue have different production cost and shipping cost. To order the printed version, please contact us.

Archiving

Jurnal Hukum Peratun utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

Jurnal Hukum Peratun is also archived on Garba Rujukan Digital (Garuda).

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Jurnal Hukum Peratun is committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics and takes all possible measures against any publication malpractices. The Editorial Board is responsible for, among others, preventing publication malpractice. Unethical behavior is unacceptable, and the Jurnal Hukum Peratun does not tolerate plagiarism in any form. Authors who submitted articles: affirm that manuscript contents are original. Furthermore, the author's submission also implies that the manuscript has not been published previously in any language, either wholly or partly, and is not currently submitted for publication elsewhere. Editors, authors, and reviewers, within the Jurnal Hukum Peratun, are to be fully committed to good publication practice and accept the responsibility for fulfilling the following duties and responsibilities, as set by the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors. As part of the Core Practices, COPE has written guidelines on http://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines.

Section A: Publication and Authorship

1. All submitted papers are subject to a strict peer-review process by at least two international reviewers who are experts in the area of the particular paper.
2. The review process is blind peer review.
3. The factors that are taken into account in the review are relevance, soundness, significance, originality, readability, and language.
4. The possible decisions include acceptance, acceptance with revisions, or rejection.
5. If authors are encouraged to revise and resubmit a submission, there is no guarantee that the revised submission will be accepted.
6. Rejected articles will not be re-reviewed.
7. The paper acceptance is constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism.
8. No research can be included in more than one publication.

Section B: Author's responsibilities

1. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work.
2. Authors must certify that the manuscript has not previously been published elsewhere.
3. Authors must certify that the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
4. Authors must participate in the peer review process.
5. Authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes.
6. All Authors mentioned in the paper must have significantly contributed to the research.
7. Authors must state that all data in the paper are real and authentic.
8. Authors must notify the Editors of any conflicts of interest.
9. Authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscripts.
10. Authors must report any errors they discover in their published paper to the Editors.

Section C: Reviewer's responsibilities

1. Reviewers should keep all information regarding papers confidential and treat them as privileged information.
2. Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author.
3. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
4. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors.
5. Reviewers should also call to the editor-in-chief's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
6. Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Section D: Editor's responsibilities

1. Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject/accept an article.
2. Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication.
3. Editors should always consider the needs of the authors and the readers when attempting to improve the publication.
4. Editors should guarantee the quality of the papers and the integrity of the academic record.
5. Editors should publish errata pages or make corrections when needed.
6. Editors should have a clear picture of research funding sources.
7. Editors should base their decisions solely on the paper's importance, originality, clarity, and relevance to the publication's scope.
8. Editors should not reverse their decisions nor overturn the ones of previous editors without serious reason.
9. Editors should preserve the anonymity of reviewers.
10. Editors should ensure that all research material they publish conforms to internationally accepted ethical guidelines.
11. Editors should only accept a paper when reasonably certain.
12. Editors should act if they suspect misconduct, whether a paper is published or unpublished, and make all reasonable attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the problem.
13. Editors should not reject papers based on suspicions, they should have proof of misconduct.
14. Editors should not allow any conflicts of interest between staff, authors, reviewers, and board members.

Policy of Screening for Plagiarism

Papers submitted to the Jurnal Hukum Peratun will be screened for plagiarism using Turnitin plagiarism detection tools. Jurnal Hukum Peratun will immediately reject papers leading to plagiarism or self-plagiarism.

Before submitting articles to reviewers, those are first checked for similarity/plagiarism tools, by a member of the editorial team. The papers submitted to the Jurnal Hukum Peratun must have a similarity level of less than 25% (Exclude Bibliography and Quote), and the similarity score to each source is no more than 3%.

Plagiarism is the exposure of another person's thoughts or words as though they were your own, without permission, credit, or acknowledgment, or because of failing to cite the sources properly. Plagiarism can take diverse forms, from literal copying to paraphrasing the work of another. To accurately judge whether an author has plagiarized, we emphasize the following possible situations:

• An author can literally copy another author's work- by copying word by word, in whole or in part, without permission, acknowledging or citing the original source. This practice can be identified by comparing the original source and the manuscript/work that is suspected of plagiarism.
• Substantial copying implies an author reproducing a substantial part of another author, without permission, acknowledgment, or citation. The substantial term can be understood both in terms of quality and quantity, being often used in the context of Intellectual property. Quality refers to the relative value of the copied text in proportion to the work as a whole.
• Paraphrasing involves taking ideas, words, or phrases from a source and crafting them into new sentences within the writing. This practice becomes unethical when the author does not properly cite or does not acknowledge the original work/author. This form of plagiarism is the more difficult form to be identified.

Copy Editing and Proofreading

Every article accepted by Jurnal Hukum Peratun shall be an object to Grammarly writing-enhancement program conducted by the Jurnal Hukum Peratun Editorial Board.

---

References Management

Every article accepted by Jurnal Hukum Peratun uses reference management software. eg Mendeley, EndNote or Zotero.

Correction and Retraction Policies

The papers published in the Jurnal Hukum Peratun will be considered retracted in the publication if :

1. They have clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, either as a result of misconduct (e.g. data fabrication) or honest error (e.g. miscalculation or experimental error)
2. The findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper crossreferencing, permission, or justification (i.e. cases of redundant publication)
3. It constitutes plagiarism
4. It contains unethical research

The mechanism of retraction follows the Retraction Guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) which can be accessed at https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.1.4

Withdrawal of Manuscripts

The author is not allowed to withdraw the submitted manuscript because the withdrawal is a waste of valuable resources that editors and referees spent a great deal of time processing submitted manuscripts and works invested by the Publisher. However, the authors could suggest the withdrawal if there is no updated progress review information after six months from our side.

1. Manuscript in Review Process. If the author still requests withdrawal of his/her manuscript when the manuscript is still in the peer-reviewing process, the author will be punished with paying $10 per paper as a withdrawal penalty to the Publisher. However, it is unethical to withdraw a submitted manuscript from one journal if accepted by another journal.
2. Accepted Manuscript for publication. The withdrawal of the accepted manuscript for publication will be punished by paying US$30 per manuscript. Withdrawal of the manuscript is only allowed after the penalty has been fully paid to the Publisher. If the author(s) does not agree with the penalty, the author and his/her affiliation will be blacklisted for publication in this journal. Even his/her previously published articles will be removed from our online system.

Email for requesting a withdrawal (Subject: Withdrawal): jurnal.peratun@gmail.com

Posting Your Article Policy

Understand the Jurnal Hukum Peratun, article sharing, and posting policies for each stage of the article life cycle.

Prior to submission to Jurnal Hukum Peratun
Authors may post their articles anywhere at any time, including on preprint servers. This does not count as a prior publication.

Upon submission to Jurnal Hukum Peratun
Authors may share or post their submitted version of the article (also known as the preprint) in the following ways:

1. On the author's personal website or their employer's website.
2. On institutional or funder websites if required.
3. In the author's classroom use.
4. On Scholarly Collaboration Networks (SCNs).

The following text should be included on the first page of the submitted article when it first is posted in any of the above outlets: "This work has been submitted to the Jurnal Hukum Peratun, https://jurnalhukumperatun.mahkamahagung.go.id/index.php/peratun/, for possible publication".

Upon acceptance to Jurnal Hukum Peratun
If an author previously posted their submitted version of the article in any of the following locations, he or she will need to replace the submitted version with the accepted version of Jurnal Hukum Peratun. No other changes may be made to the accepted article.

1. Author's personal website
2. Author's employer's website
3. Funder's repository*

Final published article

1. When the article is published, the posted version should be updated with a full citation to the original of Jurnal Hukum Peratun, including DOI. He or she will need to replace the accepted version with the published article version of Jurnal Hukum Peratun.
2. The article will follow statements on the Jurnal Hukum Peratun's copyright notice at https://jurnalhukumperatun.mahkamahagung.go.id/index.php/peratun/submissions#CopyrightNotice.